LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Missoulians care deeply about fairness, clarity, and the wellbeing of children. That’s why it’s important to understand the differences in how local leaders approach sensitive social issues. According to the recent legislative chart, Representative Tom France voted No on bills involving biological sex definitions, sex segregated facilities, protections for
individuals who decline nonbiological pronouns, restrictions on gender altering treatments for minors, school choice expansion, and religious freedom protections. My friend Ryan Darling approaches these issues with a different philosophy—one centered on clear definitions, parental involvement, and caution when policies affect children. Ryan believes families should have more educational options, that public facilities should follow consistent and predictable standards, and that minors should be protected from irreversible medical decisions until they are old enough to fully understand the consequences. He also believes religious organizations should be able to serve their communities without unnecessary government pressure.
These are meaningful differences.
Representative France’s voting record reflects one approach to governance; Ryan’s views reflect another—one grounded in clarity, responsibility, and respect for families. Missoula voters deserve to see these contrasts clearly so they can make informed decisions about the future of our community. I believe Ryan is worth supporting because he believes in our constitution and works for the good of the people!
Thank you,
Nancy J Engebretson
Alberton, MT











